Enjoy complimentary entry to high concepts and insights — chosen by our editors.
Bill Pulte, the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), introduced on July 8, 2025, that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would settle for Vantagescore 4.0 credit score scores for mortgage underwriting. This choice was communicated by way of Pulte’s social media account on X and was efficient “instantly.”
Most of the mortgage trade, together with the employees of the FHFA and the GSEs, was caught abruptly following Pulte’s announcement. Even if conforming mortgage lenders had been able to undertake Vantagescore 4.0 tomorrow, as Brad Finkelstein reported final week, the infrastructure and coverage alignment are nonetheless missing to truly make loans.
READ MORE: FHFA’s Vantagescore transfer adjustments math on mortgage insurance coverage
The street to implementation might be longer and bumpier than it appears, particularly since Director Pulte made his announcement about Vantagescore 4.0 with out troubling with the particulars. The similar goes for utilizing FICO 10T in lending. Classic FICO is the basis of mortgage credit score and is utilized by the overwhelming majority of lenders, however no person is admittedly utilizing FICO 10T at current.
Back in May 2023, we described the chaotic course of begun by Pulte’s predecessor, Sandra Thompson, (“The FHFA ought to nix its credit score rating plan, too”) to require lenders to make use of two credit score scores in the lending course of, one thing that’s arithmetically unimaginable and operationally problematic. In 2024, the FHFA allowed the use of VantageRating however required lenders to pay for 2 scores.
The progressive coverage effort by the Biden Administration to push Vantagescore was extra about press releases than substance. It failed miserably. Such had been the obstacles to implementation that the two-score regime was not ever near being adopted. Now the Trump Administration – or no less than Director Pulte – desires to revisit the query of progressive reform of credit score scores. But is not Director Bill Pulte a Republican?
READ MORE: FICO challenges FHFA’s VantageRating choice
The first apparent drawback dealing with the GSEs is that neither Vantage 4.0 nor FICO 10T, which each embrace new information for hire and utilities, have a considerable monitor report when it comes to mortgage or bond default scores. The present default mannequin in the trade is Classic FICO, which excludes the new client information and is utilized by banks, regulators, score companies and institutional buyers round the world to cost default danger.
Use of Vantagescore in non-public mortgage originations elevated considerably in 2024, however utilization by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fell. Specifically, Vantagescore noticed a 166% surge in non-public mortgage market use, however this was countered by a 42% total decline in whole Vantagescore utilization for mortgages.
The GSEs, which closely depend on FICO scores, really lowered use of Vantagescore regardless of the 2024 FHFA choice by Director Thompson to permit its use. What offers?
One trade CEO says utilizing two credit score scores is “like having two social safety numbers.” He tells NMN that two scores ought to not have been crucial, though “the risk of Vantagescore did compel FICO to replace their mannequin.”
If you comply with the progressive logic of utilizing two scores, Vantagescore and FICO will compete by giving out increased scores, defaults will go up, spreads will modify, and we are again to the place we began after spending thousands and thousands on implementation of a brand new rating regime. No matter how laborious progressives attempt, they can not dictate market outcomes.
“Right now the score companies are nowhere near a capability to mannequin Vantangescore loans for personal label securities,” says the CEO. “We cannot embrace Vantagescore loans in non-public label MBS even when we wished to…” And the fact is that, scores points aspect, many consumers of MBS would not settle for the new rating.
Another large operational hurdle is that the GSEs do not have credible pricing grids for loans underwritten with Vantagescore 4.0 or FICO 10T. How do you create a mortgage stage worth adjustment (LLPA) grid that appears at the borrower’s credit score rating and the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio of the mortgage? You take a look at the historic information. But we acquired no precise historic default information. Director Pulte and his employees might want to make up a transition desk for the two scores.
In order for lenders to make use of both Vantagescore or FICO 10T internally, they have to arbitrarily determine equate a score on Classic FICO to one among the new score scores. The whole world of residential loans and credit score is ruled by Classic FICO and the guidelines, laws and scores methodologies that rely on them. Some 70% of all residential loans are owned by bond buyers, who all use Classic FICO.
READ MORE: Fannie, Freddie add VantageRating, maintain tri-merge
The American Bankers Association, together with different trade teams like the Mortgage Bankers Association, the Housing Policy Council, and the Structured Finance Association, issued a joint assertion politely acknowledging the potential “advantages” of FHFA Director Bill Pulte’s announcement.
But additionally they highlighted the want for additional readability on “quite a few implementation questions and considerations.” The GSEs want to deal with these considerations earlier than lenders can successfully make the most of the new scoring fashions. Translated into blunt English, that is not going to occur throughout the second Trump Administration.
The varied commerce associations repeated the progressive newspeak, that the use of Vantagescore can foster “competitors in the credit score scoring market, doubtlessly resulting in decrease prices for shoppers.” Nonsense. A race to the backside in client lending may result in increased prices for taxpayers and lenders by enabling loans to shoppers unable to shoulder the burden of house possession.
Inflation in house costs and different dwelling bills has pushed house possession out of attain for a lot of Americans, however the response by coverage makers in usually worse than the drawback. How does it assist a low earnings household to be put right into a mortgage and residential buy by diluting credit score scores, with all of the attendant upfront prices, solely to lose the house to foreclosures?
The actual issue with client scores is not with the fashions however the earnings of potential debtors. While together with hire and utilities can increase some attributes of a scoring mannequin, in the end it comes all the way down to the earnings and property of the borrower, and the LTV of the mortgage. The property, not the borrower, is the safety on the mortgage, which is why LTV is the chief consider most default likelihood fashions.
READ MORE: Vantagescore use in mortgage origination jumps 166%
FICO scores are typically seen as a barely extra dependable predictor of total mortgage default danger, in line with the Urban Institute. “We discover, on common, Vantagescore 4.0 scores are increased than Classic FICO scores, particularly for refinance loans and for investor properties and second properties,” word Laurie Goodman of Urban Institute and Jun Zhu of Indiana University.
“Both credit score scoring fashions successfully distinguish between high-risk and low-risk debtors,” they conclude. Notice that the researchers are evaluating Vantagescore 4.0 to FICO Classic. There is little or no information for FICO 10T as a result of few lenders are utilizing it. But how will the distinction in fashions have an effect on defaults?
Ultimately the credit score expertise of lenders and mortgage insurers, not shoppers, shall be the true competitors in credit score scores. If, say, non-public jumbo mortgages underwritten with Vantagescore 4.0 expertise increased credit score bills than loans underwritten with FICO 10T, then lenders will cease utilizing the inferior, extra expensive rating. The market will prevail.
